Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in
Toggle navigation
Courses
Project
Project
Details
Activity
Releases
Cycle Analytics
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Charts
Issues
6
Issues
6
List
Board
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
4
Merge Requests
4
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Charts
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Charts
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
M3P2
Courses
Commits
643f1bfb
Commit
643f1bfb
authored
Dec 11, 2022
by
Claude Meny
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
Update textbook.fr.md
parent
c10ddb43
Pipeline
#14807
canceled with stage
Changes
1
Pipelines
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
83 additions
and
90 deletions
+83
-90
textbook.fr.md
...-interfaces/10.boundary-conditions/10.main/textbook.fr.md
+83
-90
No files found.
12.temporary_ins/96.electromagnetism-in-media/20.reflexion-refraction-at-interfaces/10.boundary-conditions/10.main/textbook.fr.md
View file @
643f1bfb
...
...
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ while the third and fourth
@@@@@@@@@@@@
will give information on the tangential components of $
`\overrightarrow{E}`
$ and $
`\overrightarrow{H}`
$.
>
To obtain the boundary conditions we consider a surface separating two
Linear Homogeneous and Isotropic (LHI) media whose properties such as that
the permittivity and permeability are different. We denote as
...
...
@@ -47,159 +47,152 @@ $`\overrightarrow{E}_1\,,\overrightarrow{B}_1\,,\overrightarrow{D}_1`$ and $`\ov
material 1 close to its surface. Likewise an index 2 will be used for
the fields in the second material.
Figure 3.1:
[]
{#_bookmark59 .anchor}Scheme for deriving boundary
conditions for perpendicular field components. S~1~, S~2~ and S^t^
represent respectively the surface at the top, bot- tom and interface.

_Figure 3.1 : Scheme for deriving boundary conditions for perpendicular field components._
_$`S_
1
\,
, S_2
`$ and $`
S'
`$ represent respectively the surface at the top, bot- tom and interface._
>
__**Normal components**__
##### Normal components
__D vector__
Let's apply Maxwell equation (i) to the small cylinder showed in
figure
[
3.1
]
(
#_bookmark59
)
which extends from one side to the other on
figure [3.1] which extends from one side to the other on
the separation surface. This box has a base surface A and an
infinitesimally small thickness
*δ*
. We get:
>
tS $
`\overrightarrow{D}`
$ · d
**a**
= {S
>
$
`\overrightarrow{D}`
$~1~ · d
**a**
~1~ + {S
>
$
`\overrightarrow{D}`
$~2~ · d
**a**
~2~ + {S
infinitesimally small thickness $`
\d
elta
`$. We get:
side
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
$
`\overrightarrow{D}`
$ · d
**a**
= {
*V*
>
*ρ~c~*
d
*V.*
>
If we now let
*δ*
0 symmetrically with respect to the separation
If we now let $`
\d
elta
\l
ongrightarrow 0
`$ symmetrically with respect to the separation
surface such that the cylinder gets "pressed" onto the surface:
-
The third term on the left hand side of the previous equation will
be negligible as the flux of the vector $
`\overrightarrow{D}`
$, which is a finite
*
The third term on the left hand side of the previous equation will
be negligible as the flux of the vector $`
\o
verrightarrow{D}
`$, which is a finite
quantity, through an infinitesimally small surface will approach
0.
-
The volume charge will be reduced to a surface charge at the
*
The volume charge will be reduced to a surface charge at the
interface only as the volume will approach 0. The volume charge
density is re
- placed by a surface charge density
*σ~s~*
and the
density is re
placed by a surface charge density $`
\s
igma
`$
and the
volume integral is replaced by surface integral over the middle
surface
S^t^
.
surface
$`
S'
`$
.
We obtain:
{S1 {S {Sl
@@@@@@@@
$
`\overrightarrow{D}`
$~1~ · d
**a**
~1~ + $
`\overrightarrow{D}`
$~2~ · d
**a**
~2~ =
*σ~s~*
d
*a.*
(3.7)
>
Now, considering that d
**a**
~2~ = −d
**a**
~1~ we can write:
Now, considering that $`
d
\o
verrightarrow{a_2}=-d
\o
verrightarrow{a_1}
`$ we can write:
{S ($
`\overrightarrow{D}`
$~1~ − $
`\overrightarrow{D}`
$~2~) · d
**a**
~1~ = {Sl
*σ~s~*
d
*a.*
(3.8)
@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Finally, as
S~1~ = S^t^ and d
**a**
~1~ =
**nˆ**
~2→1~d
*a*
~1~
we can
Finally, as
$`
S_1=S'
`$ and $`
d
\o
verrightarrow{a_2}=
\o
verrightarrow{n}_{2
\r
ightarrow 1}
\,
da_1
`$
we can
write:
>
**nˆ**
~2→1~ · ($
`\overrightarrow{D}`
$~1~ − $
`\overrightarrow{D}`
$~2~) =
*σ~s~*
(3.9)
>
@@@@@@@@@
or
>
*D*
~1
*n*
~ −
*D*
~2
*n*
~ =
*σ~s~*
(3.10)
>
@@@@@@@@@@@
The normal component of the vector $`
\o
verrightarrow{D}
`$ is in general discontinuous.
It is continuos only if there are no conduction charges at the
separation surface.
__
chap5
B vector__
__B vector__
The situation is identical for the vector $`
\o
verrightarrow{B}
`$, the only difference
being that the right hand side of the equation is always 0. We
conclude that:
>
**nˆ**
~2→1~ · ($
`\overrightarrow{B}`
$~1~ − $
`\overrightarrow{B}`
$~2~) = 0 (3.11)
>
@@@@@@@@@
or
>
*B*
~1
*n*
~ −
*B*
~2
*n*
~ = 0 (3.12)
>
@@@@@@@@@
The normal component of $`
\o
verrightarrow{B}
`$ is always conserved.
__**Tangential components**__

##### Tangential components
Figure 3.2:
[]
{#_bookmark60 .anchor}Contour for deriving boundary
conditions for parallel field com- ponents.

_Figure 3.2 : Contour for deriving boundary conditions for parallel field components._
__chap5 E vector__
We integrate the third Maxwell equation around the rectangular contour
C that straddles the boundary of width W and thickness
*δ*
as shown in
figure
[
3.2.
]
(
#_bookmark60
)
We chose to integrate the line integral
C that straddles the boundary of width W and thickness
$`
\d
elta
`$
as shown in
figure [3.2.]
.
We chose to integrate the line integral
following the right-hand sense relative to the surface normal
**nˆ**
*~a~*
. By letting
*δ*
→ 0, we get
>
t $
`\overrightarrow{E}`
$ ·
*d*
**l**
= $
`\overrightarrow{E}`
$~1~ ·
*A_B*
+ $
`\overrightarrow{E}`
$~2~ ·
*C_D*
= −
[
d
]
{.underline} { $
`\overrightarrow{B}`
$ ·
*d*
$
`\overrightarrow{S}`
$ → 0 (3.13)
>
$`
\o
verrightarrow{n_a}
`$. By letting $`
\d
elta
\r
ight 0
`$, we get
@@@@@@@@@@@
as the line integral along the sides goes to zero and the flux of the
induction field $`
\o
verrightarrow{B}
`$, which is a finite quantity, approaches 0.
Considering that
*C_D*
=
>
−
*A_B*
= d
**l**
, we get:
>
($
`\overrightarrow{E}`
$~1~ − $
`\overrightarrow{E}`
$~2~) · d
**l**
= 0 ∀d
**l**
/I to the separation
surface (3.14)
>
Considering that $`
\o
verrightarrow{CD}-
\o
verrightarrow{AB}=d
\o
verrightarrow{l}
`$, we get:
@@@@@@@@@@
or again
*E*
~1
*T*
~ −
*E*
~2
*T*
~ = 0 (3.15)
@@@@@@@@@@@@
i.e. the tangential components of the electric field are always
conserved at the interface. This condition can also be written:
>
**nˆ**
~2→1~
***×**
* ($`\overrightarrow{E}`$~1~ − $`\overrightarrow{E}`$~2~) = 0*
.
*
(3.16)
__chap5 H vector__
@@@@@@@@@@ $`
\q
uad equ. 3.16)
`$
Following the same reasoning as for the $
`\overrightarrow{E}`
$ vector we write for the
left hand
>
side when
*δ*
→ 0: $
`\overrightarrow{H}`
$
__H vector__
C
Following the same reasoning as for the $`
\o
verrightarrow{E}
`$ vector we write for the
left hand side when $`
\d
elta
\r
ight 0
`$ :
·
*d*
**l**
=
$
`\overrightarrow{H}`
$
$`
\o
verrightarrow{H}
`$
~1~ ·
*A_B*
@@@@@@@@@@@@@ $`
\q
uad equ. 3.17)
`$
\+
$
`\overrightarrow{H}`
$~2~ ·
*C_D.*
>
(3.17)
>
The right hand side needs more attention. The flux of the vector $`
\o
verrightarrow{D}
`$
approaches
>
0
\.
However the flux of the vector $
`\overrightarrow{j}`
$ over an infinitesimal surface
approaches 0. However the flux of the vector $`
\o
verrightarrow{J}
`$ over an infinitesimal surface
can give a finite value: the surface integral reduces to an integral
over the line of width W equal to the side of the rectangle. No volume
current can contribute, however a surface current $
`\overrightarrow{
j}`
$
*~s~*
(i.e. a
current flowing on the separation surface with dimensions
\[
*A/m*
\]
not
\[
*A/m*
^2^
\]
as $
`\overrightarrow{j
}`
$) can. This is typically the case of a
current can contribute, however a surface current $`
\o
verrightarrow{
J}_S
`$
(i.e. a
current flowing on the separation surface with dimensions
$`
[
A/m
]
`$
not
$`
[
A/m*^2
]
`$ as $`
\o
verrightarrow{J
}
`$) can. This is typically the case of a
perfect conductor where a finite current can flow through a
infinitesimally small area. We get:
>
@@@@@@@@ $`
\q
uad equ. 3.18)
`$
or again
>
($
`\overrightarrow{H}`
$~1~ − $
`\overrightarrow{H}`
$~2~) · d
**l**
=
*J~s~*
(3.18)
>
*H*
~1
*T*
~ −
*H*
~2
*T*
~ =
*J~s~*
(3.19)
>
@@@@@@@@ $`
\q
uad equ. 3.19)
`$
i.e. the tangential components of the magnetic field $`
\o
verrightarrow{H}
`$ is
discontinuous unless no surface currents exist. As for the electric
field, this condition can also be written:
>
**nˆ**
~2→1~
***×**
* ($`\overrightarrow{H}`$~1~ − $`\overrightarrow{H}`$~2~) = $`\overrightarrow{j}`$*
~s~
*
(3.20)
@@@@@@@@ $`
\q
uad equ. 3.20)
`$
!! *Summary*
!!
! *Remarks*
!
! * If medium 1 & 2 are perfect dielectrics then there are no charges
! nor surface currents at the interface, and so the tangential component
! of $`
\o
verrightarrow{H}
`$ and the normal component of $`
\o
verrightarrow{D}
`$ are both continuous.
!
! * If medium 1 is a perfect dielectric and medium 2 is a perfect metal,
! there are charges and surface currents at the interface, and so the
! tangential component of $`
\o
verrightarrow{H}
`$ and the normal component of $`
\o
verrightarrow{D}
`$ are
! not continuous.
!
! * In case of linear media, the 4 relations can be expressed in terms
! of $`
\o
verrightarrow{E}
`$ and $`
\o
verrightarrow{B}
`$ alone using the constitutive relations
! $`
\o
verrightarrow{D}=
\e
psilon
\,
$
`\overrightarrow{E}`
$ and $
`\overrightarrow{B}=\mu\,$`
\o
verrightarrow{H}
`$.
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
#### chap2 Reflection and transmission at normal incidence
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment